Authors: Fernanda Ferreira, Gwendolyn Rehrig, Madison Barker, Eleonora Beier Suphasiree Chantavarin, Beverly Cotter, Zhuang Qiu, Matthew Lowder and Hossein Karimi
Contact Email(s): fferreira@ucdavis.edu, glrehrig@ucdavis.edu, msbarker@ucdavis.edu, ejbeier@ucdavis.edu, schantavarin@ucdavis.edu, btcotter@ucdavis.edu, zkqiu@ucdavis.edu, mlowder@richmond.edu, hk702@msstate.edu
One thought on “Back to the Future: Do Influential Results from 1980s Psycholinguistics Replicate?”
Leave a Comment or Question Below
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Hi Fernanda, thanks for this.
You mentioned the difference in “and agreed” and “agreed” in the original paper. How did you fix this in the replication study here? I am assuming “agreed” is the critical region for NMA. What’s the critical region for MA?
It feels surprising to me that readers were not slowed down in first pass at both c and c+1 in NMA.